My views on abortion

In an angry mood this morning, I’m gonna have to talk about a heavy topic, abortion. It was told to me this morning that New York has full abortions even after 8 months, and that this mentality is spreading to politicians.

I believe 8 month abortions are wrong and evil. Science says the human brain in an adult, is about the same volume as when it is 9 months old. However, it is important to consider, other factors besides volume alone. Fetal development analysis:

It says perception begins after 12 weeks, therefore abortion after 3 months is murder. Meat is murder. You may argue that killing animals is not murder, because you benefit from it. But many murders have been committed in order to benefit the murderer, so murder is still murder. The killing of the baby should be the same punishment as killing of a pet. All murder punishments should be based on IQ and personality. For instance, if the murder victim was a fiendish thieving bitch, who was addicted to hard drugs, the penalty should be light. But if the murder victim was a high IQ person who was a loving and fair-minded person, the punishment for the murder should be more. Justice should not be blind. So for instance, if a woman aborts a rape-baby at three months, the punishment should be less than 8 months abortion punishment, and also less punishment than a 3 months abortion of a baby of a higher-breed. For instance, it is important to differentiate an incel from a truecel. An incel may be a geek, of high-value to society, a truecel may be low IQ, ugly, with bad genes, of no value to society, thus aborting the baby of a truecel will be less punishment than a geekcel abortion.

To be on the safe side, abortion should not performed any longer than 4 weeks. After 4 weeks is when the nerves develop (1 month). Better safe than sorry. These are my views and should be the universal views of all sane human beings.

If some thot gets pregant by a chad, then she has ample time to decide an abortion (1 month.) I was arguing with an insane religious person, they believe souls are “assigned” to babies before there is a brain, this is absurd. However, once there is nerves (after 4 weeks) there may be a soul (better safe than sorry), so abortion should not be allowed after 4 weeks. The sad irony is if a thot is too dumb to decide if she wants an abortion after 4 weeks, then the baby is probably better off not having her as a mother, still it is murder though.

It is sad to me how psychopathic and hypocritical modern women have become. It is usually females pushing the abortion agenda, yet it is females that attend baby showers and pretend to say that babies are so adorable and cute. Women need to pick one, either they adore or hate babies, how can females go around pretending to love babies but aborting them all the time, it is sickening to me. This should be the universal opinion of all sane human beings, I proved this with science and logic.

1 Like

This is unironically a high IQ post.

The explanation for this is so simple because it is derived from female behaviour in general.

Females hate babies and want them killed when they aren’t ready to have them. Females love babies more than anything else in the world when they are ready to have one.

In other words, what females hate and love is based entirely on their circumstances at any given moment and not on any higher principles what-so-ever.

It doesn’t feel pain before about 20 (18-24) weeks. The vast majority of abortions happen before this point (they would have missed five periods by then) and in many states it’s illegal to have an abortion after 22 weeks except to save the life of the mother. Nobody has an 8 month abortion unless they are going to die. It is incredibly uncommon and is probably a story used by conservative religious people to rally their base.

My mom had an abortion before me and she was very upset about it even to this day. She was still in school at the time. If she didn’t care she wouldn’t have been so upset.

Anecdotal evidence John. And I never said that all females are pro-abortion. My statement “how modern women have become” implies that modern women are different from the normal condition of women, this implies “modern women” are a separate subgroup, and thus implies NAWALT, this is very easy to deduce, John.

1 Like

If it doesn’t feel pain till after 18-24 weeks then why does the New York law make it legal until 24? Shouldn’t it be 18 weeks? Explain that to me John. The law also states that abortions are legal for other reasons, not just to save the life of the mother, but to save the health of the mother and if the fetus is “viable”, “viable”, whatever that means.

24 weeks is actual pain, it begins to twitch visibly at 18 weeks. You can Google “how many weeks fetus feel pain” and read the results from nih (national institute of health) papers. I think the current limits are very reasonable.

Ummm…you are mistaken John. This paper debunks your claim about 24 weeks. Your claim hinges on the theory that consciousness only resides in the cerebral cortex, actually many believe consciousness is also in the spinal cord and neck area of the brain as well.

I don’t agree with abortion at all but if you must then do it in the first 6 weeks. Wtf is this 8-9 month abortion shit.

1 Like

Slippery slope is real.

Give an inch, they take a mile.

I’m pro-life.

Also, unlike most people that argue being pro-life from a religious standpoint I am pro-life from a secular philosophical standpoint in avoiding a future population demographic disaster.

I wish more pro-life people would argue that point of view.

1 Like

Abortion is evil. Let them abort.

In the long term abortion is damning on population demographics of any society, a nation that doesn’t reproduce essentially cuts its own throat overtime.

I’m also sick and tired of hearing this over population bullshit or nonsense from irrational people.

Most people are so stuck in their short term myopic form of thinking, hardly anybody anymore thinks about the long term consequences of things for society as a whole which is tragic.

When you abort half of your population yearly there are damaging long term consequences demographically speaking. This is a purely logical argument that nobody of real intelligence can deny.

1 Like

True since the population isn’t actually replacing itself right now. Hence the mass immigration



Boomer Aunt: “Well what’s wrong with all the immigration? We NEED it because our population is shrinking.”

Me: “Well… what do you call a society that needs life support? A sick society.”

1 Like

Feminism is implemented

Replacement rate plummets far below 2.1

Government: “Oh GOSH this is so terrible! We never could have seen this coming. Well, guess we’ll just have to import the replacements. It’s for your own good.”

1 Like

Yes, and not only are there negative consequences on western nations concerning unlimited open immigration but there is also negative demographic population problems concerning the host nations or countries foreign immigrants are coming from.

Of course anybody that understands economics knows that mass immigration is an economic weapon to keep wages artificially low. Unlimited open mass immigration in a capitalist system is all about profit and capital over the basic lives of people.

This is how far western societies have sunk and it is pretty horrifying to contemplate.

1 Like

Notice that they throw traditional family values or lifestyles under the bus, besides the profit motive of unlimited mass immigration there is also a depopulation agenda at work as well.

1 Like

People that cry about keeping our replacement rates low in the name of overpopulation are fucking retards, as you’ve claimed.

The people we import reproduce like rabbits, at least until they too become infected by the overarching “progressive” culture. So what does that solve? It seems like they’re just interested in depopulating us.