Incels, heretical scholastic internet celibate monks, and other writings

1 Like

In medieval times religious monasteries were formed and usually they consisted of the poor, peasants, outcasts, and men that seemingly didn’t fit anywhere else in society. Of course with religious monasteries at the time joining was completely voluntary and so was the vow to God along with the oath of sexual celibacy in religious devotion to divinity. Yet the sexless male incel living in constant dehumanization, alienation, solitude, isolation, and spending huge amounts of time in self reflection is very similar to a religious monk nonetheless.

The male incel however never took any vow of celibacy nor is his life one that is voluntary, his existence is completely involuntary yet similar to that of a monk. You will notice I posted in my very first post Benedictine monks chanting because I find the lifestyles of religious monks to modern day male incels parallel each other in very similar ways.

The difference of course between a monk and an incel is very obvious completely separate from the involuntary nature they find themselves in. For the religious monks his self reflection was about finding higher meaning connecting to a higher divinity where his sexual voluntary celibacy was a way of self purification to do just that. The male incel’s self reflection however is one of shame, constant inadequacy, despair, fear, and self loathing. His sexual involuntary celibacy is a reminder of his own feelings of inferiority, inadequacy, or that the very society he lives in views him as a lesser male human being never to be loved and respected by others including the opposite sex.

1 Like

based

1 Like

As a majority of men become reduced to socio economic penury in post modern society transformed into the collective group of male undesirables known as incels unable to economically compete in the extreme post modern overly competitive sexual marketplace where women or females virtually control all of it in an unregulated manner the male incel finds himself forcibly involuntarily sexually celibate like a Benedictine monk in a monastery but unlike a conventional monastery where there is community the modern incel finds himself locked away in a perpetual daily state of loneliness, alienation, solitude, and isolation. His only sense of social interaction or community is through a Wi-Fi digital router on an electronic screen.

His altar not one of a cross or a Buddhist inscription but instead a Wi-Fi router, lap-top computer, game console, touch screen cellphone, a stack of anime manga and comic books, candles, and a bag of fresh tendies with some soda to gulp it all down. This becomes his daily communion, ritual, and sacred profane rite as his residence becomes his fortress of solitude in a monastery like fashion. In this monastery however where you can freely enter and leave at will it becomes his state of captivity and prison of a world that has deemed him obsolete, undesirable, unwanted, or outcast. His refuge is only a sanctuary from the rest of the world that despises or hates his entire existence of being. In some semblance his residence or sanctuary is like that of a post modern male leper colony in a world where he is completely unwanted. He represents a historical era where a majority of men have been deemed obsolete, unnecessary, undesirable, unwanted, disposable, sacrificial, and unneeded.

For the modern male incel the greatest depression is their entire lives and existence unfulfilled of any higher purpose, meaning, connection, community, or sense of identifying self.

1 Like

image

image

1 Like

Don’t feel bad, my living conditions is much more worse. I can’t even post a photograph of mine as it is much more worse. It’s amazing I have survived this long.

It’s amazing what has transformed in the past several decades as extreme hypergamy in conjunction of an overly competitive sexual marketplace [controlled by women] coinciding with economic crony capitalism of our nations has done to entire generations of men when added with extreme social economic inequality. It’s basically like taking sixty percent of the male population grouping them together as male expendables, disposables, and undesirables everywhere.

It’s the equivalent of taking sixty percent of the male population forcibly putting them into the position in living like St. Francis daily concerning solitude. It’s unparalleled compared to the rest of human history where human beings or men specifically were not meant to live in such isolation, alienation, dehumanization, solitary confinement, and such especially involuntary by no choice of their own.

What’s more interesting given marriage, fertility, or relationship statistics concerning their drastic huge sweeping declines it seems this number of society’s male undesirables popularly coined as incels seems to be on the increase with no end or stopping in sight within the immediate future. I think this is why the feminists are freaking out over incels because within relative short order of time this phenomena will no longer be able to be ignored and if feminists were to ever breach the subject honestly [would they?] they would be forced to admit that social inequality against men is a real thing. Up until this point this is something they haven’t done and it is something they refuse to even address.

As we enter the 2020s where radical feminism takes control over every social facet of society a newly imposed sexual puritanism emerges. One where looking at a woman the wrong way is considered sexual harassment and deemed an offensive micro-aggression of the mentally triggered female involved. Unlike the old sexual puritanism headed by men this new sexual puritanism is headed by a social cultural matriarchy that married to the state has the ability to codify laws in place against the general male population. An environment like Canada where addressing somebody by the wrong sex or gender pronoun will have you arrested upon gender discrimination.

Yet we’re still lead to believe that the ‘evil’ patriarchy controls everything and where all men are somehow privileged with rising economic inequality, rising male sexlessness forced into involuntary celibacy, family decline, marriage decline, populations on the verge of demographic fertility crisis, and such that an increasing majority of men collectively share the brunt edge of. Yet somehow all men supposedly benefit from this male privilege…

As we enter the new world order it looks much the same as the old world order where instead female power is maximized all throughout society in a gynocentric manner where this power itself is matriarchal in structure and where the new original sin is that of being a traditionally conservative male in of itself.

good music. fitting for aristocracy.

Yet we’re still lead to believe that the ‘evil’ patriarchy controls everything and where all men are somehow privileged with rising economic inequality, rising male sexlessness forced into involuntary celibacy, family decline, marriage decline, populations on the verge of demographic fertility crisis, and such that an increasing majority of men collectively share the brunt edge of. Yet somehow all men supposedly benefit from this male privilege…

Thats not how it works. Patriarchy is the same as default of nature. In Nature Patriarchy (alpha males) control the society. In most cases this is not beneficial to the majority of males. The Feminist fallacy is believing that patriarchy is somehow inherently beneficial to males and gives priviledges to males. In Natural patriarchies (alpha males in nature) mostly benefits the females and not the males of the society.

The Gynocracy seems like a downgrade from Patriarchy to me, though.

At least with the “Patriarchy” there weren’t so many Incels.

1 Like

lol we still live in a Patriarchy, most politicians, cops, lawyers and judges are men

Chads live in the lap of luxury and feminism is just an attack on all non-chad males

So what do you call it when everything is the same, minus the feminism?

(I do think that with the knowledge acquired from feminism, adjustments can be made to the system that preceded it).

If the majority of politicians, cops, lawyers and judges are men then it is a patriarchy.

Debate can be about the feminist fallacy of the idea that patriarchy benefits males, when, in Nature, most alpha male patriarchies only benefits the females and not the males of the tribe. In Nature mammalian matriarchy is rare, only hyenas for instance. Most animal mammals have patriarchy, usually with the alpha male getting all the girls and all the other males living in exile and celibacy, at least within primate and ape species.

It’s only a patriarchy in the sense that a small number of men controls things and benefit from it at a majority of other men’s expense [loss] while at the same time promoting radical feminism which they themselves have a complete total monopoly on as its gatekeepers.